Due to reduced rules on this ‘only-hole’, Rory McIlroy gets a ‘good break’
Rory McIlroy and caddy Harry Diamond on Thursday at the 11th hole at Muirfield Village.
Golf station
Rory McIlroy’s ball? It fell left into the water and the red penalty line on the 11th hole of Muirfield Village, and rolled over.
But his reduced sentence?
It went into the water – and into the yard during the first round of the Memorial.
How? Thanks to the “hole-only” setting, which used to be universal.
“It’s a good break for him,” PGA Tour CEO Mark Dusbabek said on Golf Channel.
The sequence began with McIlroy’s tee shot, which flew left on the 589-yard par-5, hit the trees and fell to the left of the river and the red penalty line, before it went in. Thursday. In most cases now, as defined in Rule 17.1d (3), the drop will be found from where the ball last crossed the edge of the red penalty area.
But McIlroy was able to get to the right of the water – because Model Local Rule 8B-2 was in play. It is known as reverse sided relief.
Perhaps there are some questions here, one of which is: Why was the Model Local Law applicable? Most notably, if it wasn’t for that, McIlroy would have had to hit the slope to the water, and Dusbabek said on Golf Channel radio that he would have had trouble hitting.
“Usually in areas with red penalties, there is no opposite relief,” Dusbabek said on the radio. “However, we created it this week in this hole only because the player is discouraged by falling over there. You can see that hill over there. Rory will be dropping the ball and he will be playing downhill and it will be difficult to advance the ball.
“So we introduced that. It’s a big break for him. He’ll still take one penalty for going into the stream, but it’s still a lot better here.”
On the USGA website, the Model Ground Rule is described as follows:
Cameron Smith says that ignoring this 1 myth has helped him a lot
Nick Dimengo
“Rule 17.1 gives a player the option of receiving sideline relief or returning to the line based on where his ball last crossed the edge of the red penalty area. But in some cases (for example, due to a red penalty area near the boundary of the course), those options may leave the player with no reasonable option other than to obtain distance relief.”
But wouldn’t the freedom of opposite parties have played on the board? It was necessary. On the broadcast, commentator Frank Nobilo noted that, too.
So why the change?
On its website, the USGA describes it this way:
“The freedom of the opposition team was a difficult technique that many players did not know and it was not used often.
“The primary purpose of this exemption was previously to provide an additional option to assist in unusual situations where no relief behind the line (Rule 26-1b) or lateral relief on the side where the ball has entered a water hazard (Rule 26-1c(i)) appears to be applicable and is the only reasonable option for the player it was a relief under the penalty of strokes and distance (Rule 26-1a).
“In practice, opposing parties’ relief was often taken when a player received sufficient relief under one or both relief options and thus provided an unnecessary additional option that could sometimes be seen as more beneficial.
“This change also helps to avoid any concern that, with the increased use of red penalty areas, a player could use the other side’s option to cross the green side of the penalty area, thereby avoiding the challenge of overplaying. place of atonement.”
Another question:
Did McIlroy take advantage?
Not really. After his tee shot, from about 290 yards out, he attempted to hook a 3-wood to the green, but it landed in the trees on the right. From there, he chipped in and put two for bogey, and finished with a two-under 70, one back of leader Adam Hadwin.
Source link
