T20 World Cup 2024 – USA hit first ever stoppage penalty at crucial time against India
A stopwatch to speed up overs has become a permanent fixture in men’s ODIs and T20Is from June 1. The relevant regulation states: “A stopwatch will be used to control the time taken between overs. If the bowling team is not ready to bowl the next over within seconds of 60 for the previous completion, a penalty of five runs will be imposed for the third time in an innings.”
The test of this playing condition had encouraging results in terms of surface levels. “The results of the clock stoppage case presented to the Chief Executives’ Committee (CEC), showed that approximately 20 minutes per ODI match were saved in time,” the ICC said while confirming the regulation for all international limited-overs cricket. played by men. During the trial, neither team was found to have exceeded one minute between the three overs of the innings, making this the first five-run penalty in the case.
Following the loss, the USA still need to win or lose their final game against Ireland to advance to the Super Eight. If they don’t get points in their last game, their chances of progressing may drop in the run-up. India have sealed their place in the Super Eight with three wins in three matches.
It’s not like the penalty that surprised the USA.
“It’s not just the cricket part of the cricket game, but there are other issues that need to be addressed. [among the players]. It is a new law. Most of our players wouldn’t have heard of it before we played in the Bangladesh series or the Canada series earlier this year. So, look, it’s something we have to fix, we’ll sit down and talk about it, but we can improve it, yes. “
Law said the referees had warned the USA players twice before issuing the penalty.
“The players know the rules, but it’s something that if you haven’t played for a long time, it’s very difficult to get it into your brain,” said Law. “So, the information from the referees was that, they were given two clear warnings, and then it was up to the players to respond. And we didn’t respond quickly enough, we didn’t do it well enough, and that’s what we can do. address.”
Another thing that all teams should learn from this is that Law did not put down defeat even though it came at a critical time. He said it didn’t even affect the players because there were only five runs left in the 40 over game.
“It didn’t affect the outcome of the match as many people would suggest. But losing by five runs was important at the time. But, again, it might have just put us in the 19th or 20th over, rather than finishing in the 18th.”
Stuart Law
“I don’t think it affected the outcome of the game,” he said. “Five runs wouldn’t have affected the outcome of the game, so I don’t think there was any movement [the players]. No, I thought we stuck to our guns, fought hard, fought to the death. I thought we showed great character against one of the best teams in the world. “
Law had no problem with the ICC trying to speed up the game. He was asked if these measures could jeopardize the quality of cricket being played, he replied, “I think there should be a speed of play. I think if you put out matches that are supposed to last three and a half hours, they will go four and a half hours, that is too little. The ICC is there to put rules and regulations. We as coaches and groups are there to follow those rules and regulations.
“If there are enough voices saying that it may disrupt the game, I am sure that the ICC will take action on this matter. . When the momentum is with you, you want to keep that momentum running quickly and put the opposition under pressure that way.
“So it’s not here or there. It didn’t affect the outcome of the game like a lot of people would suggest. But losing by five runs was important at the time. But, again, it might have just taken us 19 or 20 more, rather than 18.”
Siddharth Monga is a senior writer at ESPNcricinfo
Source link