Women’s T20 World Cup – Ind vs NZ – Harmanpreet Kaur left upset after Amelia Kerr’s dismissal was no drama

0 0 2 minutes read

Women’s T20 World Cup – Ind vs NZ – Harmanpreet Kaur left upset after Amelia Kerr’s dismissal was no drama

There was confusion, and a lot of anger, as India were embroiled in an umpiring dispute during their Women’s World T20 match against New Zealand in Dubai on Friday, which India lost by 58 runs. They felt they had a legitimate wicket – Amelia Kerr’s run – but it was not to be, the umpires ruling that the ball was dead when it was dismissed.

The run-out appeal came after Kerr was caught at his ground while trying for the second run in the 14th over of New Zealand’s innings. After hitting a long ball off Deepti Sharma’s last ball, Kerr and Sophie Devine took one. With Harmanpreet Kaur, the striker, collecting the ball and it coming into her hand, Kerr and Devine tried to squeeze a second. Deepti, on the other hand, had asked the umpire to return her cap and it was given to her. Seeing the batsmen running, Harmanpreet fired the ball, Richa Ghosh collected it, and it broke the stumps and Kerr was short on his crease.

But the referees – Anna Harris and Jacqueline Williams – ruled that the ball was dead, and anything that came after, the dismissal in this case, would not count as having happened with the ball “in play”.

The match was held for more than seven minutes, with India coach Amol Muzumdar visibly upset by the decision, arguing with the fourth umpire, while Kerr was close to the boundary before being called.

Speaking after the match, Jemimah Rodrigues said, “I wasn’t there when the umpire gave Deepti the cap, but, I mean, New Zealand were sure it was two runs and Amelia took it, which means it’s an over.” We hadn’t been called, and we were all thinking, well, if that’s over it’s not going to happen.

Speaking after the game, Devine said he hadn’t heard the referee call it over and that he and Kerr were trying to steal another game. “What I understand is that the ball is dead when the referee says ‘over’, I didn’t hear that the referee said ‘over’,” he said. “It was exciting, and I think it broke the momentum and maybe stopped them [India] slowly. That is part of cricket. Translations will vary slightly. We’ve been trying to squeeze in runs here and there because you never know when one run will change things. Referees have a job to do and we respect that, and sometimes I push the boundaries a bit.”

For context, here’s a look at the applicable portion of the MCC law on the matter.

However, the questions did not end there.

With one decision taken, Kerr had to return to strike for the start of the next over. However, it was Devine who hit Renuka Singh and scored one. Kerr was out on the next delivery when he hit the ball to Pooja Vastrakar at another cover, it was dismissed for 13 off 22 balls.

“We know how important Amelia’s wicket is, at the time it felt a little off [like] why didn’t it go in our favor,” Rodrigues said. “But, at the same time, I think we did what we could. We talked to the referee. Then we had to accept the referee’s decision and move on. So I think that’s what we’ve done really well, is that we’ve just moved on from that. And we got him out soon. So that works for us.”

Source link

Admin 16 mins ago

0 0 2 minutes read